For which archive types are the FreeCommander's included internal archiver plugins known to be reliable?
I ask because I was trying to open a tarball, and the fcZip plugin incorrectly reported that the tarball was invalid. So I switched to fc7Zip for tarballs, and so far, it seems to be working.
Thus, I think it will be helpful for us to generate a comprehensive list of which archive types are fully supported by each FreeCommander internal archiver (or please point me to such a list if it already exists!).
For which archive types are the FreeCommander's internal archiver plugins known to be reliable?
Re: For which archive types are the FreeCommander's internal archiver plugins known to be reliable?
fcZip can only process archive files that are compatible with the ZIP format. These files can have various extensions, e.g. zip, jar, war, ear, epub, docx, xlsx and many others.
fc7Zip can handle multiple formats. The most common formats for extraction are: 7z, ZIP, RAR, GZIP, BZIP2, TAR and ISO. Many other file formats can also be opened.
With Ctrl+PgDn you can check if one archive file can be opened with any active archiver plugin.
fc7Zip can handle multiple formats. The most common formats for extraction are: 7z, ZIP, RAR, GZIP, BZIP2, TAR and ISO. Many other file formats can also be opened.
With Ctrl+PgDn you can check if one archive file can be opened with any active archiver plugin.
Re: For which archive types are the FreeCommander's internal archiver plugins known to be reliable?
Thanks Marek. By default, FC is configured to use fcZip for zip files. But as you mentioned, fc7Zip can also handle zip files. Is there any reason to use fcZip when fc7Zip is available?Marek wrote: 17.11.2025, 21:05 fcZip can only process archive files that are compatible with the ZIP format. These files can have various extensions, e.g. zip, jar, war, ear, epub, docx, xlsx and many others.
fc7Zip can handle multiple formats. The most common formats for extraction are: 7z, ZIP, RAR, GZIP, BZIP2, TAR and ISO. Many other file formats can also be opened.
In which part of the UI do you press Ctrl+PgDn? Which command does Ctrl+PgDn need to invoke to accomplish what you mentioned?Marek wrote: 17.11.2025, 21:05 With Ctrl+PgDn you can check if one archive file can be opened with any active archiver plugin.
Re: For which archive types are the FreeCommander's internal archiver plugins known to be reliable?
fc7Zip is only in the 64 bit versionIs there any reason to use fcZip when fc7Zip is available?
Select any file you suppose it is archive file and press Ctrl+PgDn.In which part of the UI do you press Ctrl+PgDn?
If it is archive file and any active plugin support the format - the file will be opened.
Re: For which archive types are the FreeCommander's internal archiver plugins known to be reliable?
Thanks. For the 64-bit version, is there any reason for the user to prefer either fcZip or fc7Zip?Marek wrote: 18.11.2025, 20:06fc7Zip is only in the 64 bit versionIs there any reason to use fcZip when fc7Zip is available?
Select any file you suppose it is archive file and press Ctrl+PgDn.In which part of the UI do you press Ctrl+PgDn?
If it is archive file and any active plugin support the format - the file will be opened.
[/quote]
I tested this on several archives including 'FreeCommanderXE_chm_en.zip'.
When I pressed Ctrl+PgDn, FC kept the current item selected while moving the focus to the last file visible at the bottom of the current pane. The zip file was never opened.
Re: For which archive types are the FreeCommander's internal archiver plugins known to be reliable?
fcZip is used for many years.For the 64-bit version, is there any reason for the user to prefer either fcZip or fc7Zip?
fc7Zip is new in FreeCommander.
Press and hold CTRL, press PgDn - this is how all Ctrl+... shortcuts work.When I pressed Ctrl+PgDn, FC kept the current item selected while moving the focus to the last file visible at the bottom of the current pane. The zip file was never opened.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests