1] I think that it would be beneficial, if these guidelines http://forum.freecommander.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=8330 would also request from users an usage of some sort of standardized set of folders and files; and also provide it for them. Something like what you Dreamer have done when creating your various schemas. It would be really easy then to compare different schemas / versions. I do not now how many files or sub-folders and of what kind it should contain, but I can suggest the name for this folder: FreeCommander Schemas Presentation [or something like that]. So that every screenshoot would look the same [aside of course from colors] and maybe aside form the letter of the drive- although for those unification purposes a
Code: Select all
C:\FreeCommander Schemas Presentation\
2] Why is that Color Schemes - Guide topic closed for editing in the first place? What I am writing here should be posted there, and not in this thread
3] Is not 800 x 600 resolution too small in the year 2018? Come on- what percentage of people is still running their workspace in 800 x 600? The word is currently moving on from HD [1080p] to 4K [2160p]; in a 16:9 format which translates to a 1,777...8 aspect ratio, while that 800 x 600 translates to a 1.333 ratio. Yes I know, that some old systems in companies or in goverments buildings can be utilizing even Windows 98 and a CRT monitors with low resolutions- but again, what diminutive percentage can possibly that be? Do you know how a 800 x 600 picture comically looks nowadays?
4] I use 21:9 monitor. And so I have just checked if that
Code: Select all
/N /NewIni=%FcAppDataPath%\Settings\FreeCommanderTest.ini /NoPlugins /Lng=English /ShowHidden /size=800x600
Code: Select all
Control Panel\Appearance and Personalization\Display
5] That topic with guidelines speaks of
Code: Select all
/N /NewIni=%FcAppDataPath%\Settings\FreeCommanderTest.ini /NoPlugins /Lng=English /ShowHidden /size=800x600
Code: Select all
FreeCommander.exe /N /NewIni=%FcAppDataPath%\Settings\FreeCommanderTest.ini /NoPlugins /Lng=English /ShowHidden /size=800x600
6] The publication, or even the name of the schema itself, should contain the version of FC with which it was created. Because in the future there are suppose to be updates to FC, that will allow for configuring more of the elements
7] If the changes / guidelines are to be upgraded, then it should be done now, where there are only few schemas available, all done by Dreamer. . But maybe all of that could be somehow automated and / or be taken care of on the creator's side? I mean: people would make the schemas, tests them, and send them for publication- with a screenshoot being produced not by them?